Why were security guards eliminated as a supplemental security measure?

Prepare for the LRAFB SFPC Safeguarding Classified Information in the NISP Test with flashcards and multiple-choice questions, including hints and explanations. Get ready for your exam!

Multiple Choice

Why were security guards eliminated as a supplemental security measure?

Explanation:
Cost-effectiveness drives why guards were eliminated as a supplemental security measure. An intrusion-detection system provides continuous, automated monitoring and rapid alerting at a fraction of the ongoing cost of hiring, training, scheduling, and paying benefits to security personnel. This makes IDS a more economical way to add defense in depth, so relying on it reduces the need for human guards in a supplemental role. Guards can offer deterrence and judgment, but their higher, recurring costs often outweigh the benefits when an automated system can cover the same risks more efficiently. Regulations don’t universally prohibit guards, and there isn’t a blanket requirement that IDS be used at every facility.

Cost-effectiveness drives why guards were eliminated as a supplemental security measure. An intrusion-detection system provides continuous, automated monitoring and rapid alerting at a fraction of the ongoing cost of hiring, training, scheduling, and paying benefits to security personnel. This makes IDS a more economical way to add defense in depth, so relying on it reduces the need for human guards in a supplemental role. Guards can offer deterrence and judgment, but their higher, recurring costs often outweigh the benefits when an automated system can cover the same risks more efficiently. Regulations don’t universally prohibit guards, and there isn’t a blanket requirement that IDS be used at every facility.

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy