True or False: A written record of the combination for a security container is always required.

True or False: A written record of the combination for a security container is always required.

• A. True
• B. False
• C. Only for access after a security breach
• D. Only when the combination changes

Answer: (B)

The key idea is that safeguarding access codes should minimize exposing the actual combination. A written record of a security container’s combination creates a tangible risk if that record is lost, stolen, or viewed by someone unauthorized, so it is not something you keep by default. In practice, the combination is typically memorized by an authorized custodian or stored using approved, secure methods that do not reveal the code in plain text. If documentation is required, it focuses on who accessed the container and when, or on changes to access procedures, rather than recording the actual numbers. Because of these protections, saying a written record is always required is not correct.

The key idea is that safeguarding access codes should minimize exposing the actual combination. A written record of a security container’s combination creates a tangible risk if that record is lost, stolen, or viewed by someone unauthorized, so it is not something you keep by default. In practice, the combination is typically memorized by an authorized custodian or stored using approved, secure methods that do not reveal the code in plain text. If documentation is required, it focuses on who accessed the container and when, or on changes to access procedures, rather than recording the actual numbers. Because of these protections, saying a written record is always required is not correct.